Managing
Continuous Change
Carol Kinsey Goman, Ph.D.
A reporter once asked Dale
Berra, son of baseball great Yogi Berra, and a major leaguer himself,
if he was similar to his father. To which Dale replied, taking
a page from his oft-quoted father, "No, our similarities
are different."
I thought of this comment
the other day when a client I had worked with several years ago
contacted me about speaking at an upcoming leadership event.
"Sure!" I said,
"I'd love to work with your organization again. But tell
me, are you facing the same problems with organizational change
as when I last addressed this audience?" He quickly replied,
"Oh no, it's nothing like before. Sure, we are still trying
to get people to embrace change, but the change is completely
different!"
Over 20 years ago, I began
researching, writing and speaking about managing the "human
side" of organizational change. At that time I thought it
was a topic that would be a top priority -- for a few years (until
we'd all mastered the strategies and techniques of change management)
-- and then the focus would shift to more current organizational
challenges.
I was wrong.
Two decades later, dealing
with change remains the crucial organizational challenge.
In a recent survey by the
Conference Board, 539 global CEOs were asked to list their top
concerns. In Europe and Asia as well as in North America, organizational
flexibility and adaptability to change consistently ranked at
the top of the list. Only revenue growth received a higher ranking.
What I overlooked in my
assumption of change mastery is the radical way change would,
well . . . change. Many leaders did become proficient in managing
incremental change (continuous improvement) and the occasional
(or annual) large-scale transformation. But managers today are
facing a flood of continuous, overlapping, and accelerating change
that has turned their organizations upside down. And managing
people through that kind of change requires all the communication
and leadership strategies we learned in the past - and then some.
The shift from "a
change" to "constant change" is more than just
semantics. The increased difficulty lies in the fact that most
people and processes are set up for continuity, not chaos. We're
built to defend the status quo, not annihilate it. But the world
is throwing change at us with such intensity that there is hardly
enough time to regain our equilibrium or catch our breath. Nor
is there much hope that the rate of change will ease in the future.
So, what does it take to
manage people through continuous change? Here are some suggestions:
o Realize that resistance
to change is inevitable - and highly emotional. This may not really
surprise you, but understand that it is a very real result of
our neurological makeup. Change jerks us out of our comfort zone
by stimulating the prefrontal cortex, an energy-intensive section
of the brain responsible for insight and impulse control. But
the prefrontal cortex is also directly linked to the most primitive
part of the brain, the amygdala (the brain's fear circuitry, which
in turn controls our "flight or fight" response). And
when the prefrontal cortex is overwhelmed with complex and unfamiliar
concepts, the amygdala connection gets kicked into high gear.
All of us are then subject to the psychological disorientation
and pain that can manifest in anxiety, fear, depression, sadness,
fatigue or anger.
Didn't think you were hired
to manage emotional turmoil? Think again.
Being aware of and responsive
to the emotional component of change is now a prerequisite for
effective leadership. This task is complicated by the fact that
the emotional cycle of transition (denial, resistance, choice,
acceptance, engagement) overlaps - as one change begins while
others are in various stages.
o Give people a stabilizing
foundation. In a constantly changing organization, where instability
must be embraced as positive, a sense of stability can still be
maintained through corporate identity and collective focus of
purpose. The leader's role here is to create stability through
a constant reinterpretation of the company's history, present
activities, and vision for the future. And, by using the term
vision, I'm not referring to a corporate statement punctuated
by bullet points. I'm talking about a clearly articulated, emotionally
charged, and encompassing picture of what the organization is
trying to achieve.
o Help your staff/team/department
realize that change really is the only constant. Never let people
believe that once any single change is completed, the organization
will solidify into a new form. Instead, help them understand that
solidity has a much shorter life span than ever before. As processes
temporarily manifest themselves in structures, we all should be
getting ready for the next transformation.
o Champion information
access and knowledge sharing. As one savvy communicator put it,
"My most important function is to feed back organizational
data to the whole organization. The data are often quite simple,
containing a large percentage of information already known to
many. But when an organization is willing to publicly present
that information, to listen to different interpretations and to
encourage the conversation -- the result is a powerful catalyst
for change."
o Encourage employees to
mingle. The new change-management fundamentals include an increasing
focus on relationships and collaboration. Social networks - those
ties among individuals that are based on mutual trust, shared
work experiences, and common physical and virtual spaces are in
many senses the true structure of today's organizations. Anything
you as a leader can do to nurture these mutually rewarding, complex
and shifting relationships will enhance the creativity and change
readiness within your team or throughout your organization.
o Give up the illusion
of control. The biggest obstacle to the organizational flexibility
that executives say they want may be their unwillingness to give
up control. Rather than tighten the reins, leaders need to loosen
their grip in order to align the energies and talents of their
teams and organizations around change initiatives. No one likes
change that is mandated - but most of us react favorably to change
we are part of creating.
Leaders need to loosen
their hold on information, as well. Transparent communication
means disclosing market realities and the company's inner workings
to everyone -- not just to the upper echelon. It requires an unprecedented
openness: a proactive, even aggressive, sharing of financials,
strategy, business opportunities, risks, successes and failures.
People need pertinent information about demographic, global, economic,
technological, consumer and competitive trends. They need to understand
the economic reality of the business and why that reality is the
driving force behind change. Most of all, people need to understand
how their actions impact the success of change initiatives - and
how those initiatives impact the overall success of the corporation.
I often tell audiences
that "organizations don't change. People do . . . or they
don't." The similarities in today's continuous change may
indeed be different from change in the past. But here's one thing
that has hasn't changed. People are still the key.
Or, as Yogi Berra might
have explained it: When it comes to the importance of the human
element in change, "It's déjà vu all over again."
Carol Kinsey Goman, Ph.D.,
presents keynote addresses and seminars for management conferences
and major trade associations around the world. She is an expert
on helping individuals and organizations thrive on change. Carol
is the author of nine books, including "This Isn't the Company
I Joined"- How to Lead in a Business Turned Upside Down.
She can be reached by email: cgoman@ckg.com, phone: 510-52601727,
or through her web site: www.ckg.com.